MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2116412804 · doi:10.1139/z04-112

Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of the genus<i>Tokudaia</i>within Murinae (Muridae; Rodentia) inferred from the nucleotide sequences encoding the Cyt<i>b</i>gene, RAG 1, and IRBP

2004· article· en· W2116412804 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jun J. Sato, Hitoshi Suzuki

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Zoology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAnimal Ecology and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyPhylogenetic treeCytochrome bPhylogeneticsGenusZoologyEvolutionary biologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The phylogenetic relationships of six genera of Murinae (Apodemus, Diplothrix, Micromys, Mus, Rattus, and Tokudaia) were examined using the nucleotide sequences for the mitochondrial cytochrome b (Cytb), as well as the nuclear recombination activating gene 1 (RAG1) and interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP), with special emphasis on the position of the genus Tokudaia, which is endemic to the Ryukyu Islands. Compared with Cytb at all codon positions, the first and second codon positions of Cytb, RAG1 (1002 base pairs (bp)), and IRBP (1586 bp) sequences were less prone to saturation. Close affinity between the genera Tokudaia and Apodemus was observed in the analyses using the IRBP (1586 bp) and combined nuclear (2588 bp; RAG1 + IRBP) sequences. The divergence time for the Tokudaia–Apodemus clade was estimated at approximately 6.5–8.0 Ma, which is more recent than previously reported, thereby indicating the recent colonization of the Ryukyu Islands by the genus Tokudaia. The other relationships among the main genera were highly ambiguous, owing either to saturation or insufficient phylogenetic information. The radiation of the main genera within a relatively short period of evolutionary time may explain the unresolved topologies, although molecular sources that are less subject to saturation are required to resolve the outstanding issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.187
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ZoologySame topicAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207