← all works
Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
About CanadaIts subject is Canada, wherever its authors sit.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- European Journal of Epidemiology
- Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Field
- Decision Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- MedicinePublic healthScale (ratio)EpidemiologyQuality assessmentEnvironmental healthQuality (philosophy)Family medicineExternal quality assessmentInternal medicinePathology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no