Signaling through TLR7 enhances the immunosuppressive activity of murine CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although signaling through certain TLRs is known to modulate the function of T lymphocytes, the effect of TLR7 stimulation on CD4(+)CD25(+) T(reg) cell activity has not yet been elucidated. In this study, we show that mouse CD4(+)CD25(+) T(reg) cells express TLR7 mRNA and protein. We therefore used the TLR7 agonists imiquimod, gardiquimod, and single-stranded poly(U) to show that TLR7 stimulation enhanced the ability of murine T(reg) cells to suppress anti-CD3/anti-CD28 mAb-coated bead-stimulated proliferation of syngeneic CD4(+)CD25(-) T(resp) cells. In contrast, imiquimod failed to enhance the suppressor function of T(reg) cells from mice deficient in the MyD88 adaptor protein involved in TLR7 and other TLR signal transduction. Imiquimod increased murine T(reg) cell-mediated suppression of T(resp) cell proliferation induced by anti-TCRbeta mAb in the presence of syngeneic BMDCs, and T(reg) cells from gardiquimod-treated mice exhibited enhanced in vitro suppressor function. Moreover, levels of T(resp) cell-secreted IL-2 and IFN-gamma were reduced further in the presence of T(reg) cells plus imiquimod in comparison with T(reg) cells alone. In addition, imiquimod treatment increased CD25 expression by T(reg) cells and caused exogenous IL-2 to enhance T(reg) cell suppressor function. Furthermore, combined treatment with imiquimod and IL-2 increased Foxp3 expression by T(reg) cells. Collectively, these findings suggest that TLR7 signaling enhanced the suppressor function of T(reg) cells by sensitizing T(reg) cells to IL-2-induced activation. We speculate that TLR7-stimulated enhancement of T(reg) cell suppressor function may modulate host T cell responses against ssRNA viruses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".