Identification of chromosomal fusion sites in<i>Arabidopsis</i>mutants using sequential bicolour BAC-FISH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Double stranded chromosomal breaks are repaired by homologous recombination or nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). When broken chromosome ends are fused together by NHEJ, the resulting dicentric chromosomes can be detected as anaphase bridges during the subsequent mitosis. Telomeres in the absence of functional telomerase shorten, became unprotected, and are eventually recognized by the cell repair system as double stranded breaks. As result, chromosomes of Arabidopsis thaliana plants that are deficient in the gene for telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) are prone to chromosome fusions. We use Arabidopsis tert-/- mutants as a model system for analyzing terminal chromosome fusions. Here we report a novel and sensitive cytogenetic assay for the identification and characterization of chromosome-terminal fusion events by employing fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with multiple probes and a repeated hybridization approach. A mixture of chromosome-specific subtelomeric probes is applied successively in 3 FISH reactions to the slides containing mitotic anaphase figures with anaphase bridges. Each figure is registered by a CCD camera after each in situ hybridization procedure. By comparing the signals presented on the bridge in successive images the assessment of the particular chromosome arms involved in fusion is possible. This experimental setup enables unambiguous identification of individual chromosome ends employed in fusion events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".