Activin A Regulates Porcine Follicle-Stimulating Hormone β-Subunit Transcription via Cooperative Actions of SMADs and FOXL2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activins stimulate FSH synthesis and secretion by pituitary gonadotrope cells. Activin A induction of porcine and murine FSHβ (Fshb) gene transcription in immortalized gonadotropes is dependent on homolog of Drosophila mothers against decapentaplegic (SMAD) proteins as well as the forkhead transcription factor L2 (FOXL2). Using both heterologous and homologous cell models, we demonstrate that FOXL2 functionally synergizes with SMAD3/4 to stimulate porcine Fshb promoter-reporter activity. We further show that endogenous FOXL2 and SMAD2/3 physically interact in homologous cells. We identify two composite cis-elements of adjacent FOXL2 and SMAD binding sites in the proximal porcine Fshb promoter that mediate activin A, FOXL2, and SMAD3 actions. FOXL2 can bind these elements independently of SMADs, whereas SMAD3/4 binding requires high-affinity FOXL2 binding. Conversely, FOXL2 alone is insufficient to regulate Fshb transcription and requires SMADs to induce promoter activity. Collectively, our data suggest a model in which activins stimulate formation and nuclear accumulation of SMAD3/4 complexes, which interact with FOXL2 bound to at least two proximal promoter elements. This association stabilizes SMAD3/4 binding to adjacent SMAD binding elements. SMAD-FOXL2 complexes then mediate activation of transcription through a currently unknown mechanism. Conservation of one of the two composite cis-elements suggests that this may form part of a general mechanism whereby activins regulate Fshb subunit transcription and FSH synthesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".