MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2117719235 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.105908

In Vivo Measurement of the Affinity and Density of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Subtype 1 in Rat Brain Using <sup>18</sup>F-FITM in Small-Animal PET

2012· article· en· W2117719235 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tomoteru Yamasaki, Masayui Fujinaga, Kazunori Kawamura, Joji Yui, Akiko Hatori, Tomoyuki Ohya, Lin Xie, Hidekatsu Wakizaka, Yuichiro Yoshida, Toshimitsu Fukumura, Ming‐Rong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
KeywordsRadioligandLigand (biochemistry)In vivoMetabotropic glutamate receptorDissociation constantChemistryMetabotropic glutamate receptor 1ReceptorBinding potentialGlutamate receptorRadioligand AssayStereochemistryBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 (mGluR1) is a crucial molecular target in the central nervous system disorders. 4-(18)F-fluoro-N-[4-[6-(isopropylamino)pyrimidin-4-yl]-1,3-thiazol-2-yl]-N-methylbenzamide ((18)F-FITM) has been recently developed as a useful PET ligand for mGluR1 imaging in our laboratory. In this study, we aimed to measure the affinity and density of mGluR1 using PET with (18)F-FITM in rat brain under the in vivo conditions. METHODS: Binding potentials (BP(ND)) and amounts of specific binding (bound ligand concentration) at equilibrium state in brain regions were noninvasively estimated using the equilibrium analysis combined with the receptor-blocked approach (EA RBA) for kinetic analysis of (18)F-FITM PET results in place of reference tissue methods. Using BP(ND) and specific binding values of rats treated with multidose ligand, we performed Scatchard analyses for in vivo measurements of mGluR1 density (maximum number of binding sites, or B(max)) and ligand affinity (dissociation constant, or K(d)) in brain regions, respectively. RESULTS: The pretreatment of rats with unlabeled FITM (1 mg/kg) occupied an mGluR1 binding site of (18)F-FITM by more than 99% and did not affect the input function. Hence, we used the tissue time-activity curve for receptor-blocked rats as representative of the nondisplaceable (free and nonspecific binding of radioligand) compartment. The BP(ND) based on EA RBA showed a high correlation with the BP(ND) based on invasive Logan plot graphical analysis in the thalamus, hippocampus, striatum, and cingulate cortex. The K(d) (nM) and B(max) (pmol/mL) obtained by the Scatchard analyses with the multidose ligand assays were 2.1 and 36.3, respectively, for the thalamus; 2.1 and 27.5, respectively, for the hippocampus; 1.5 and 22.2, respectively, for the striatum; and 1.5 and 20.5, respectively, for the cingulate cortex with a high confidence. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to our knowledge to measure the in vivo affinity (K(d) and binding potential) of (18)F-FITM and mGluR1 density (B(max)) with a high correlation to in vitro values in rat brain regions. This measurement using PET with (18)F-FITM would be a useful index for research about mGluR1 functions in central nervous system disorders and development of new pharmaceuticals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchFrench-language works237,207