MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118021919 · doi:10.1517/17460441.2011.573783

New methods for multiple sclerosis drug discovery

2011· article· en· W2118021919 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Warford, George S. Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueExpert Opinion on Drug Discovery · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple sclerosisPathogenesisDiseaseDrug discoveryDrugDrug developmentImmune systemApoptosisImmunologyMedicineBiologyBioinformaticsPharmacologyGeneticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: MS is a heterogeneous disorder that requires the development of better diagnostics to identify disease subtypes enabling appropriate therapeutic intervention at an early stage of the disease. Accumulating evidence indicates that members of the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) family play an important role in the pathogenesis of MS by reducing the apoptotic elimination of autoreactive immune cells. AREAS COVERED: The authors describe improved animal modeling strategies to identify compounds that have immunomodulatory, neurorestorative and neuroprotective properties. In addition, the authors propose new approaches to better model cognitive dysfunction in MS, which will aid the development of novel therapeutics for this complex disorder. The paper provides the reader with an appreciation for the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of apoptosis-related proteins for MS. EXPERT OPINION: Recent evidence suggests that increased resistance of autoreactive immune cells to apoptotic elimination is a contributing factor to both disease susceptibility and progression in MS. This occurs, at least in part, because of elevated levels of the IAP family of anti-apoptotic genes that display distinct expression profiles associated with different subtypes of MS. The authors believe that the detection and targeting of members of the IAP family can provide better drugs for MS. Particularly, the authors feel that the overexpression of IAPs in animal models can provide novel insights into MS for both its pathogenesis and the discovery of new lead compounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExpert Opinion on Drug DiscoverySame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207