MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118450246 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2006.1610561

Transit-time broadening in pulsed Doppler ultrasound: a generalized amplitude modulation model

2006· article· en· W2118450246 on OpenAlexaff
Alfred C. H. Yu, Amir Steinman, R.S.C. Cobbold

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsThe Wilson CentreIllumisonics (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDoppler broadeningDoppler effectAmplitudeOpticsBandwidth (computing)Beam (structure)PhysicsModulation (music)SIGNAL (programming language)Flow (mathematics)Amplitude modulationFrequency modulationComputational physicsSpectral lineAcousticsMechanicsTelecommunicationsEngineeringComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Doppler ultrasound, transit-time broadening arises from the finite scatterer transit time through the sample volume. As a unifying description of this broadening mechanism, a generalized amplitude modulation signal model was developed to collectively account for the transit-time effects of the ultrasound beam geometry and the range gate characteristics. Simulations based on a pulsed linear-array system also were performed to study the broadening extent for different scatterer flow lines. With our signal model and simulation results, some generalized insights were obtained on the characteristics of transit-time broadening. First, as consistent with previous findings, we found that, for scatterers passing though the center of the sample volume, the broadening extent mainly depends on beam-forming characteristics at higher beam-flow angles, but it is more dependent on range gate parameters at smaller angles. Second, for the central flow line, a transition angle exists in which a significant change occurs in the governing parameters of transit-time broadening. Third, for the general case in which scatterers undertake an off-central path through the sample volume, the broadening extent depends on both the beam geometry and the range gate. Bandwidth skewing and further spectral broadening also can be seen for these off-central flow lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207