MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2118693119 · doi:10.1177/0091270006292163

Drug‐Disease Interactions: Losartan Effect Is Not Downregulated by Rheumatoid Arthritis

2006· article· en· W2118693119 on OpenAlexaff
Noriko Daneshtalab, Richard Lewanczuk, Anthony S. Russell, Fakhreddin Jamali

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLosartanRheumatoid arthritisActive metabolitePharmacologyMetaboliteMedicineArthritisInflammationPharmacokineticsInternal medicineEndocrinologyAngiotensin IIChemistryReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory conditions, such as rheumatoid arthritis, reduce response to calcium channel and beta-adrenergic antagonists but not the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT(1)R) antagonist valsartan. Inflammation also reduces clearance of some drugs or active metabolite, thereby reducing response. Active (n = 14) and controlled rheumatoid arthritis (n = 12) and healthy subjects (n = 12) received losartan (100 mg). Blood pressures were measured, and samples were taken for pharmacokinetic and inflammatory mediator concentration determination. Active disease significantly increased arthritic index, nitric oxide, and Creactive protein. Although no between-group difference in plasma losartan concentration-time curves was observed, concentrations of the active metabolite, EXP 3174, were significantly reduced by arthritis. This, however, was not accompanied by reduced clinical response. One subject produced no detectable concentrations of EXP 3174 likely due to insufficient CYP2C9 activity. Despite reduced concentrations of the active metabolite, AT1R antagonists potency does not appear to be reduced by inflammation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Clinical PharmacologySame topicReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingFrench-language works237,207