MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120244315 · doi:10.1159/000149798

Memantine Potentiates Agonist-Induced Ca<sup>2+</sup> Responses in HEK 293 Cells

2008· article· en· W2120244315 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexandre P. Blanchard, Gaétan Guillemette, Guylain Boulay

Bibliographic record

VenueCellular Physiology and Biochemistry · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicIon Channels and Receptors
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchUniversité de SherbrookeHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsMemantineAgonistIntracellularNMDA receptorChemistryExtracellularPharmacologyHEK 293 cellsCalcium in biologyReceptorBiophysicsCell biologyEndocrinologyBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The Alzheimer drug memantine (1-amino-3,5-dimethyl-adamantane) blocks the pore channel of the NMDA receptor. Since memantine also blocks the 5-HT(3) receptor, neuronal nicotinic receptor, and voltage-activated Na(+) channels, the purpose of our study was to verify whether memantine could influence other types of channels involved in the regulation of Ca(2+). METHODS: Free intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations in whole cells and in saponin-permeabilized cells were monitored spectrofluorometrically in HEK-293 cells stably expressing TRPC6. RESULTS: Memantine decreased the basal level of intracellular Ca(2+), increased the content of the intracellular Ca(2+) store, which in turn increased the agonist-induced intracellular Ca(2+) release, and increased the store-operated Ca(2+) entry. CONCLUSION: In addition to blocking the NMDA receptor, memantine also decreases the basal level of intracellular Ca(2+) and increases the sensitivity of cells to extracellular stimuli. All these effects may be of benefit in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellular Physiology and BiochemistrySame topicIon Channels and ReceptorsFrench-language works237,207