MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120317081 · doi:10.1093/intimm/dxp092

Histidine decarboxylase but not histamine receptor 1 or 2 deficiency protects from K/BxN serum-induced arthritis

2009· article· en· W2120317081 on OpenAlexaff
Narendiran Rajasekaran, Samuel G. Solomon, Takeshi Watanabe, Hiroshi Ohtsu, Mieczysław Gajda, Robert Brauer, Harald Illges

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Immunology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMast cells and histamine
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsHistamineHistidine decarboxylaseArthritisHistamine H4 receptorHistamine receptorEndocrinologyHistamine H2 receptorMast cellInternal medicineReceptorChemistryInflammatory arthritisImmunologyHistidineMedicineEnzymeBiochemistryAntagonist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Serum transfer from arthritic K/BxN mice into naive animals results in arthritis. Mast cells have been shown to be essential since mice lacking these cell type do not develop arthritis upon serum injection. Mast cell function depends on the release of granules filled with mediators such as histamine. Mice deficient in histidine decarboxylase (HDC(-/-)) that do not produce histamine and mice deficient for histamine receptor 1 (H1R(-/-)) or histamine receptor 2 (H2R(-/-)) were injected with arthritogenic sera from the K/BxN mice, and the progression of arthritis was observed through the next 2 weeks. HDC(-/-) mice that are histamine free developed a milder form of arthritis in comparison with the wild-type controls. In both receptor-deficient mice as well as in wild-type controls, the onset and severity of clinical arthritis and ankle thickening occurred during day 1 to 3. These results indicate that histamine is required but not indispensable for the development of serum-induced arthritis and histamine receptors other than those studied here may be involved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.302
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational ImmunologySame topicMast cells and histamineFrench-language works237,207