MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2120393838 · doi:10.1109/tia.2007.908188

Attrition of the Charge on a Carrier Moving Through a Gas

2007· article· en· W2120393838 on OpenAlexafffund
Zdenek Kucerovsky, W.D. Greason

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersSuncor Energy Incorporated
KeywordsTriboelectric effectFaraday cupCharge (physics)Ambipolar diffusionCharge carrierFaraday cageMaterials sciencePlasmaAtomic physicsChemistryIonOptoelectronicsMagnetic fieldComposite materialPhysicsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metallic, free-flying probes were used for sensing areas filled with weak concentration of free, unbalanced ambipolar charge or plasma, or for determining the charge on aerosols. Depending on the conditions, problems can be encountered in the behavior of the probe. This paper focuses on the charge exchange processes occurring between a small metal charge carrier and the gaseous medium through which the carrier travels; these processes may lead to a charge imbalance. In the experiments described, a small lead pellet was propelled with a small volume of pressurized carbon dioxide on a horizontal ballistic trajectory in air. At the launch site, the probe was charged by triboelectrification in a polytetrafluoroethylene tube, and its pre-and post flight charge measured with dynamic Faraday cups. The charge loss, incurred by the pellet crossing a 96 cm path (40 ms flight time), was 11%. Analysis of the results suggests that the onset of discharge from the carrier's body to the gas medium is a likely cause for the observed results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicLightning and Electromagnetic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207