MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2120562335 · doi:10.17169/fqs-6.1.511

Central Questions of Anonymization: A Case Study of Secondary Use of Qualitative Data

2008· article· en· W2120562335 on OpenAlexaffabout
Denise Thomson, Lana Bzdel, Karen Golden‐Biddle, Trish Reay, Carole A. Estabrooks

Bibliographic record

VenueForum: Qualitative Social Research (Freie Universität Berlin) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicData Analysis and Archiving
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProcess (computing)SituatedData scienceData anonymizationQualitative researchComputer scienceKnowledge managementInternet privacySociologyInformation privacySocial scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.251
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.283
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.749
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2510.283
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0310.038
Scholarly communication0.0120.015
Open science0.0050.015
Research integrity0.0110.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.601
GPT teacher head0.566
Teacher spread0.035 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum: Qualitative Social Research (Freie Universität Berlin)→Same topicData Analysis and Archiving→French-language works237,207→