<i>E. coli</i> 6S RNA release from RNA polymerase requires σ<sup>70</sup> ejection by scrunching and is orchestrated by a conserved RNA hairpin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 6S RNA in Escherichia coli suppresses housekeeping transcription by binding to RNA polymerase holoenzyme (core polymerase + σ⁷⁰) under low nutrient conditions and rescues σ⁷⁰-dependent transcription in high nutrient conditions by the synthesis of a short product RNA (pRNA) using itself as a template. Here we characterize a kinetic intermediate that arises during 6S RNA release. This state, consisting of 6S RNA and core polymerase, is related to the formation of a top-strand "release" hairpin that is conserved across the γ-proteobacteria. Deliberately slowing the intrinsic 6S RNA release rate by nucleotide feeding experiments reveals that σ⁷⁰ ejection occurs abruptly once a pRNA length of 9 nucleotides (nt) is reached. After σ⁷⁰ ejection, an additional 4 nt of pRNA synthesis is required before the 6S:pRNA complex is finally released from core polymerase. Changing the E. coli 6S RNA sequence to preclude formation of the release hairpin dramatically slows the speed of 6S RNA release but, surprisingly, does not alter the abruptness of σ⁷⁰ ejection. Rather, the pRNA size required to trigger σ⁷⁰ release increases from 9 nt to 14 nt. That a precise pRNA length is required to trigger σ⁷⁰ release either with or without a hairpin implicates an intrinsic "scrunching"-type release mechanism. We speculate that the release hairpin serves two primary functions in the γ-proteobacteria: First, its formation strips single-stranded "-10" 6S RNA interactions away from σ⁷⁰. Second, the formation of the hairpin accumulates RNA into a region of the polymerase complex previously associated with DNA scrunching, further destabilizing the 6S:pRNA:polymerase complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".