RGD Conjugation to Polyethyleneimine Does Not Improve DNA Delivery to Bone Marrow Stromal Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSC) modified with therapeutic genes are being actively pursued for gene therapy protocols. To develop safe and effective nonviral methods for BMSC modification, the cationic polymer polyethyleneimine (PEI) has been utilized to condense plasmid DNA for intracellular delivery. This study was conducted to explore the feasibility of increasing the PEI's effectiveness by coupling integrin-binding arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) peptides to the polymer. BMSC from rats were isolated and expanded in culture for gene transfer studies. In contrast to our expectations, RGD-conjugated PEI did not exhibit an enhanced binding to BMSC. This was the case where the peptides were conjugated to PEI by short, disulfide linkages or long poly(ethylene glycol) linkages. Using a reporter gene for the enhanced green fluorescent protein, the transfection efficiency of RGD-conjugated PEI was also lower than the delivery by the native PEI, which exhibited equivalent transfection efficiency to that of an adenovirus. We conclude that native PEI was sufficient for the transformation of BMSC and that coupling of the integrin-binding RGD-peptides did not improve the effectiveness of this polymer for BMSC transfection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".