Kinetics of Polynucleotide Phosphorylase: Comparison of Enzymes from <i>Streptomyces</i> and <i>Escherichia coli</i> and Effects of Nucleoside Diphosphates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We examined the activity of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPase) from Streptomyces coelicolor, Streptomyces antibioticus, and Escherichia coli in phosphorolysis using substrates derived from the rpsO-pnp operon of S. coelicolor. The Streptomyces and E. coli enzymes were both able to digest a substrate with a 3' single-stranded tail although E. coli PNPase was more effective in digesting this substrate than were the Streptomyces enzymes. The kcat for the E. coli enzyme was ca. twofold higher than that observed with the S. coelicolor enzyme. S. coelicolor PNPase was more effective than its E. coli counterpart in digesting a substrate possessing a 3' stem-loop structure, and the Km for the E. coli enzyme was ca. twice that of the S. coelicolor enzyme. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays revealed an increased affinity of S. coelicolor PNPase for the substrate possessing a 3' stem-loop structure compared with the E. coli enzyme. We observed an effect of nucleoside diphosphates on the activity of the S. coelicolor PNPase but not the E. coli enzyme. In the presence of a mixture of 20 microM ADP, CDP, GDP, and UDP, the Km for the phosphorolysis of the substrate with the 3' stem-loop was some fivefold lower than the value observed in the absence of nucleoside diphosphates. No effect of nucleoside diphosphates on the phosphorolytic activity of E. coli PNPase was observed. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of an effect of nucleoside diphosphates, the normal substrates for polymerization by PNPase, on the phosphorolytic activity of that enzyme.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".