The lived experience of hope among parents of a child with Duchenne muscular dystrophy: perceiving the human being beyond the illness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is genetically determined, progressive and incurable. Our study's primary objective was to describe the lived experience of hope among parents of a child with DMD. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 parents having a child with DMD. A qualitative/ phenomenological approach was utilized to analyse the essential aspects of this experience. RESULTS: We show that the experience of parental hope emerges from the cognitive appraisal of DMD. The child's illness can be perceived in three ways: as a severe loss, a call to adapt or a way to rediscover the child. Each of these appraisals leads to different ways of hoping. Parents can hope for a cure, the child's well-being or to see their child becoming a whole person. Hope can help parents absorb the initial crisis, sustain their adaptation or prepare for the fatal outcome. DISCUSSION: Previous research has demonstrated that cognitive appraisal plays a central role in psychosocial adaptation to illness. Our research indicates that perception can also shape the nature of hope and suggests that health professionals should pay particular attention to the nature of parental hope. The fabric of parental hope can give an indication of how parents are coping and adjusting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it