MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2125952723 · doi:10.1088/0953-8984/18/17/012

Clustering of impurity atoms in Co-doped anatase TiO<sub>2</sub>thin films probed with soft x-ray fluorescence

2006· article· en· W2125952723 on OpenAlexaff
Gap Soo Chang, E.Z. Kurmaev, D W Boukhvalov, Louis Finkelstein, Do‐Hyung Kim, T-W Noh, A. Moewes, T. A. Callcott

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Condensed Matter · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicZnO doping and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFerromagnetismAnataseAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Materials scienceImpurityOxygenDopingExcited stateEmission spectrumCrystallographyEpitaxyX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySpectral lineCondensed matter physicsAtomic physicsChemistryNuclear magnetic resonanceNanotechnologyPhysicsCatalysisPhotocatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electronic structure of Co-doped anatase TiO(2) epitaxial thin films grown at different partial oxygen pressures is investigated using soft x-ray emission spectroscopy. The resonantly excited Co L(2,3) x-ray emission spectra of ferromagnetic Ti(0.96)Co(0.04)O(2) samples for the oxygen-deficient regime show that the ratio of integral intensities for Co L(2) and L(3) emission lines significantly decreases with respect to nonmagnetic samples in the oxygen-rich regime. This is due to L(2)L(3)M(4,5) Coster-Kronig transitions and suggests that ferromagnetic Ti(0.96)Co(0.04)O(2) samples have n-type charge carriers and Co-Co bonds between substitutional and interstitial Co atoms are present while Co-O bonds are dominant in nonmagnetic Ti(0.96)Co(0.04)O(2) samples in the oxygen-rich regime. Electronic structure calculations show that the presence of free charge carriers and Co segregation play a crucial role in strong ferromagnetism at room temperature in Co-doped TiO(2).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Condensed MatterSame topicZnO doping and propertiesFrench-language works237,207