MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2126257109 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031666

Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 5. The effect of spectrum of disease on the performance of diagnostic tests

2005· review· en· W2126257109 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Víctor M. Montori

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and Diabetes
FundersUniversity of California, San FranciscoMcMaster UniversityU.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
KeywordsDiagnostic testTest (biology)MedicineDiseaseDiagnostic accuracyMedical physicsIntensive care medicineEvidence-based medicineClinical PracticeAlternative medicinePathologyPhysical therapyPediatricsRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For clinicians to use a diagnostic test in clinical practice, they need to know how well the test distinguishes between those who have the suspected disease or condition and those who do not. If investigators choose clinically inappropriate populations for their study of a diagnostic test and

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.570
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.570
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2005
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsFrench-language works237,207