Restriction Enzyme Analysis of DNA Methylation in “Condensed” Chromatin of Ha‐<i>Ras</i>‐Transformed NIH 3T3 Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increased amounts of chromatin condensation (i.e., localized areas of high DNA density, or chromatin higher order packing state) have been described in NIH 3T3 cells transformed with the Ha-ras oncogene. The structural basis for this oncogene-mediated alteration in nuclear organization is unknown. Since DNA methylation is likely to be involved in regulating the nucleosomal level of DNA packaging, we studied the role of DNA methylation in higher-order chromatin organization induced by Ha-ras. CpG-methylated DNA content was estimated in "condensed" chromatin of Ha-ras-transformed NIH 3T3 cell lines which differ in ras expression and ras-induced metastatic ability but present approximately the same values of "condensed" chromatin areas. The question posed was that if DNA methylation were involved with the chromatin higher-order organization induced by Ha-ras in these cell lines, the methylated DNA density in the "condensed" chromatin would also be the same. The DNA evaluation was performed by video image analysis in Feulgen-stained cells previously subjected to treatment with Msp I and Hpa II restriction enzymes, which distinguish between methylated and non-methylated DNA. The amount of methylated CpG sequences not digested by Hpa II in "condensed" chromatin regions was found to vary in the studied ras-transformed cell lines. DNA CpG methylation status is thus suggested not to be involved with the higher order chromatin condensation induced by ras transformation in the mentioned NIH 3T3 cell lines.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".