Site‐specific DNA binding and bending by the <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> Hbb protein
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Borrelia burgdorferi Hbb protein shows sequence similarity to members of the Escherichia coli HU/integration host factor (IHF) family of DNA accessory factors. We have overexpressed the hbb gene product in E. coli and purified the protein to near homogeneity. Biochemical analyses have revealed that Hbb has unique properties and is neither a strict HU nor IHF analogue. Hbb was found to bind specifically to a site in the putative origin of DNA replication between dnaA and dnaN. DNA footprinting studies have shown that this site is unrelated to the consensus sequence recognized by IHF proteins. Hbb induces a dramatic bend (> 126 degrees ) at this site and was also shown to restrain negative supercoils efficiently upon DNA binding. These features of the protein suggest that Hbb may act as a DNA accessory factor that facilitates the assembly of higher order protein-DNA complexes, such as those involved in DNA replication, transcription, recombination, packaging and perhaps other DNA metabolic processes unique to Borrelia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".