MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Site‐specific DNA binding and bending by the <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i> Hbb protein

2000· article· en· W2126912388 on OpenAlexafffund
Kerri Kobryn, Darius Z. Naigamwalla, George Chaconas

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicVector-borne infectious diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsBiologyDnaADNA supercoilDNADNA footprintingBorrelia burgdorferiDNA replicationPlasmidMolecular biologyHMG-boxGeneGeneticsProkaryotic DNA replicationDNA-binding proteinEscherichia coliDNA binding siteOrigin of replicationPromoterTranscription factorGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Borrelia burgdorferi Hbb protein shows sequence similarity to members of the Escherichia coli HU/integration host factor (IHF) family of DNA accessory factors. We have overexpressed the hbb gene product in E. coli and purified the protein to near homogeneity. Biochemical analyses have revealed that Hbb has unique properties and is neither a strict HU nor IHF analogue. Hbb was found to bind specifically to a site in the putative origin of DNA replication between dnaA and dnaN. DNA footprinting studies have shown that this site is unrelated to the consensus sequence recognized by IHF proteins. Hbb induces a dramatic bend (> 126 degrees ) at this site and was also shown to restrain negative supercoils efficiently upon DNA binding. These features of the protein suggest that Hbb may act as a DNA accessory factor that facilitates the assembly of higher order protein-DNA complexes, such as those involved in DNA replication, transcription, recombination, packaging and perhaps other DNA metabolic processes unique to Borrelia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicVector-borne infectious diseasesFrench-language works237,207