Characterization of the <i>cciIR</i> Quorum-Sensing System in <i>Burkholderia cenocepacia</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several transmissible Burkholderia cenocepacia strains that infect multiple cystic fibrosis patients contain a genomic island designated as the cenocepacia island (cci). The cci contains a predicted N-acylhomoserine lactone (AHL) synthase gene, cciI, and a predicted response regulator gene, cciR. AHL production profiles indicated that CciI catalyzes the synthesis of N-hexanoyl-l-homoserine lactone and minor amounts of N-octanoyl-l-homoserine lactone. The cciI and cciR genes were found to be cotranscribed by reverse transcription-PCR analysis, and the expression of a cciIR::luxCDABE fusion in a cciR mutant suggested that the cciIR system negatively regulates its own expression. B. cenocepacia strains also have a cepIR quorum-sensing system. Expression of cepI::luxCDABE or cepR::luxCDABE fusions in a cciR mutant showed that CciR negatively regulates cepI but does not regulate cepR. Expression of the cciIR::luxCDABE fusion in a cepR mutant indicated that functional CepR is required for cciIR expression. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that the cciIR system was acquired by horizontal gene transfer from a distantly related organism and subsequently incorporated into the ancestral cepIR regulatory network. Mutations in cciI, cciR, cepI cciI, and cepR cciR were constructed in B. cenocepacia K56-2. The cciI mutant had greater protease activity and less swarming motility than the parent strain. The cciR mutant had less protease activity than the parent strain. The phenotypes of the cepI cciI and cepR cciR mutants were similar to cepI or cepR mutants, with less protease activity and swarming motility than the parent strain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".