MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2129105261 · doi:10.2174/15701638113109990001

A Phosphoproteomics Approach to Identify Candidate Kinase Inhibitor Pathway Targets in Lymphoma-Like Primary Cell Lines

2013· article· en· W2129105261 on OpenAlexaff
Miliana Vojvodic, Loen M. Hansford, Olena Morozova, Kim M. Blakely, Paul Taylor, Kelly E. Fathers, Jason Moffat, Marco A. Marra, Kristen M. Smith, Michael F. Moran, David R. Kaplan

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Drug Discovery Technologies · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhosphoproteomicsKinaseComputational biologyCancer researchBiologyLymphomaCell cultureCell biologyChemistryProtein kinase AGeneticsImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mass spectrometry-based technologies are increasingly utilized in drug discovery. Phosphoproteomics in particular has allowed for the efficient surveying of phosphotyrosine signaling pathways involved in various diseases states, most prominently in cancer. We describe a phosphotyrosine-based proteomics screening approach to identify signaling pathways and tyrosine kinase inhibitor targets in highly tumorigenic human lymphoma-like primary cells. We identified several receptor tyrosine kinase pathways and validated SRC family kinases (SFKs) as potential drug targets for targeted selection of small molecule inhibitors. BMS-354825 (dasatinib) and SKI-606 (bosutinib), second and third generation clinical SFK/ABL inhibitors, were found to be potent cytotoxic agents against tumorigenic cells with low toxicity to normal pediatric stem cells. Both SFK inhibitors reduced ERK1/2 and AKT phosphorylation and induced apoptosis. This study supports the adaptation of high-end mass spectrometry techniques for the efficient identification of candidate tyrosine kinases as novel therapeutic targets in primary cancer cell lines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Drug Discovery TechnologiesSame topicComputational Drug Discovery MethodsFrench-language works237,207