Frequent recombination and low level of clonality within Salmonella enterica subspecies I
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genetic relationship and population structure of Salmonella enterica subspecies I strains were analysed using nucleotide sequences of four genes (mglA, proV, torC and speC). Fifteen strains from the Salmonella reference collection B (SARB), belonging to 13 serovars, were analysed. Sequence data of two housekeeping genes, mdh and mutS, of the same 15 strains reported by Brown et al. (2003) (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100, 15676-15681) were also included in the analyses. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that there was a lack of congruence among the six gene trees. Split decomposition analysis resolved only five strains with a network structure, while others showed a star phylogeny. Compatibility values for the SARB strains were the lowest in comparison to those for strains representing different subspecies of S. enterica. These results showed that the genes studied have undergone frequent recombination, suggesting a low level of clonality within subspecies I of S. enterica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".