Sodium bicarbonate to prevent increases in serum creatinine after cardiac surgery: A pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial*
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test whether perioperative sodium bicarbonate infusion can attenuate postoperative increases in serum creatinine in cardiac surgical patients. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Operating rooms and intensive care unit at a tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Cohort of 100 cardiac surgical patients at increased risk of postoperative acute renal dysfunction. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to either 24 hrs of intravenous infusion of sodium bicarbonate (4 mmol/kg) or sodium chloride (4 mmol/kg). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients developing acute renal dysfunction defined as a postoperative increase in plasma creatinine concentration >25% of baseline within the first five postoperative days. Secondary outcomes included changes in plasma creatinine, plasma urea, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin/urinary creatinine ratio. Patients were well balanced for baseline characteristics. Sodium bicarbonate infusion increased plasma bicarbonate concentration (p < 0.001), base excess (p < 0.001), plasma pH (p < 0.001), and urine pH (p < 0.001). Fewer patients in the sodium bicarbonate group (16 of 50) developed a postoperative increase in serum creatinine compared with control (26 of 50) (odds ratio 0.43 [95% confidence interval 0.19-0.98]), (p = 0.043). The increase in plasma creatinine, plasma urea, urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, and urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin/urinary creatinine ratio was less in patients receiving sodium bicarbonate, (p = 0.014; p = 0.047; p = 0.009; p = 0.004). There were no significant side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium bicarbonate loading and continuous infusion was associated with a lower incidence of acute renal dysfunction in cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass. The findings of this pilot study justify further investigation. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00334191).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".