Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF)-I/IGF-Binding Protein-3 Complex: Therapeutic Efficacy and Mechanism of Protection against Type 1 Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IGF-I regulates islet beta-cell growth, survival, and metabolism and protects against type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, the therapeutic efficacy of free IGF-I may be limited by its biological half-life in vivo. We investigated whether prolongation of its half-life as an IGF-I/IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-3 complex affords increased protection against T1D and whether this occurs by influencing T cell function and/or islet beta-cell growth and survival. Administration of IGF-I either alone or as an IGF-I/IGFBP-3 complex reduced the severity of insulitis and delayed the onset of T1D in nonobese diabetic mice, but IGF-I/IGFBP-3 was significantly more effective. Protection from T1D elicited by IGF-I/IGFBP-3 was mediated by up-regulated CCL4 and down-regulated CCL3 gene expression in pancreatic draining lymph nodes, activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt/protein kinase B signaling pathway of beta-cells, reduced beta-cell apoptosis, and stimulation of beta-cell replication. Reduced beta-cell apoptosis resulted from elevated Bcl-2 and Bcl-X(L) activity and diminished caspase-9 activity, indicating a novel role for a mitochondrial-dependent pathway of beta-cell death. Thus, IGF-I/IGFBP-3 affords more efficient protection from insulitis, beta-cell destruction, and T1D than IGF-I, and this complex may represent an efficacious therapeutic treatment for the prevention of T1D.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".