MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131048417 · doi:10.1109/tmech.2004.828627

A Systematic Procedure for the Design of Piezoelectric Inchworm Precision Positioners

2004· article· en· W2131048417 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPiezoelectric Actuators and Control
Canadian institutionsCenterLine (Canada)University of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrame (networking)TraverseFinite element methodStiffnessThrustActuatorPiezoelectricityComputer scienceMechanical engineeringControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringAcousticsPhysicsStructural engineeringArtificial intelligenceGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Design equations are developed and integrated into a computerized design tool in order to facilitate the creation of inchworm piezoelectric based positioners. Fundamental to the development of the design tool is the piezoelectric actuator and motor frame stiffness interaction and its influence on positioner performance. A generalized motor frame configuration for each of the motor subsystems is presented and used to generate key initial positioner frame geometry. An inchworm precision positioner is implemented based on the generalized motor frame and the computerized design tool and it is shown experimentally and through finite-element analysis that the design approach is effective for precision positioner design. The prototype of the inchworm positioner developed is shown to have a stiffness in the direction of motion of 88 N//spl mu/m, a maximum thrust of 150 N and a traversing speed of up to 20 mm/s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.694

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it