MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2131464323 · doi:10.1002/jlcr.1947

Temperature effects on the stereospecificity of nucleophilic fluorination: formation of <i>trans</i>‐[<sup>18</sup>F]4‐fluoro‐<scp>l</scp>‐proline during the synthesis of <i>cis</i>‐[<sup>18</sup>F]4‐fluoro‐<scp>l</scp>‐proline

2011· article· en· W2131464323 on OpenAlexaff
Babak Behnam Azad, Rezwan Ashique, N. R. Labiris, Raman Chirakal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Labelled Compounds and Radiopharmaceuticals · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryStereospecificityDiastereomerHydrolysisNucleophileCis–trans isomerismWalden inversionAcid hydrolysisStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluorine‐18 labeled (2S,4S)‐4‐fluoro‐l‐proline (cis‐[18F]4‐FPro) has been reported to be a potential positron emission tomography tracer to study abnormal collagen synthesis occurring in pulmonary fibrosis, osteosarcomas, mammary and colon carcinomas. In this paper, we report the stereospecific radiofluorination of (2S,4R)‐N‐tert‐butoxycarbonyl‐4‐(p‐toluenesulfonyloxy) proline methyl ester (at 110°C) to produce diastereomerically pure cis‐[18F]4‐FPro in 38% radiochemical yield at the end of a 90‐min synthesis. Investigation of the effect of temperature on the stereospecificity of nucleophilic fluorination showed that diasteriomerically pure cis‐[18F]4‐FPro or trans‐[18F]4‐FPro was produced at lower temperatures (85°C–110°C) during the fluorination of (2S,4R) or (2S,4S) precursors, respectively. However, at higher temperatures (130°C–145°C), fluorination of (2S,4R) precursor produced a mixture of cis‐[18F]4‐FPro and trans‐[18F]4‐FPro diastereomers with cis‐[18F]4‐FPro as the predominant isomer. Hydrolysis of the purified fluorinated intermediate was carried out either in one step, using 2 m triflic acid at 145°C for 10 min, or in two steps where the intermediate was heated in 1 m HCl at 110°C for 10 min followed by stirring at room temperature in 1 N NaOH for 5 min. The aqueous hydrolysis mixture was loaded onto an anion exchange column (acetate form for one‐step hydrolysis) or an ion retardation column (two‐step hydrolysis) followed by a C18 Sep‐Pak® (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). Pure cis‐[18F]4‐FPro was then eluted with sterile water. We also report that epimerization of cis‐[18F]4‐FPro occurs during the two‐step hydrolysis (H+ followed by OH−) of the intermediate, resulting in 5 ± 3% trans‐[18F]4‐FPro, whereas the one‐step acid hydrolysis yielded pure cis‐[18F]4‐FPro in the final product. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Labelled Compounds and RadiopharmaceuticalsSame topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisFrench-language works237,207