Effects of sigma ligands on NMDA receptor function in the bulbectomy model of depression: a behavioural study in the rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sigma (sigma) ligands have been shown to modulate NMDA receptor activity. In the present study we used the olfactory bulbectomy (OBX) animal model of depression to assess the effects of the sigma1 ligand igmesine on OBX-induced behaviour. Behavioural experiments demonstrated OBX (saline-treated) rats to have increased dizocilpine-induced behavioural modifications, including locomotor and circling activity as compared to Sham rats (saline-treated). A short-term (7 d) treatment with low doses of igmesine (50-200 microg/kg.d s.c.) had no effect on dizocilpine-induced behaviour while long-term treatments (14 d) with low doses of igmesine reversed the effect of the bulbectomy such that the treated OBX rats' behaviour was not significantly different from Sham-saline rats. Short-term treatments with high doses of igmesine (500-1000 microg/kg.d) also reversed the increased locomotor and circling behaviour seen in OBX rats (saline-treated) while long-term treatments with the same high doses did not. These results provide behavioural evidence for sigma ligand's potential to reverse some OBX-induced behaviours. Moreover, they support the notion of a bell-shaped dose-response curve previously reported for sigma ligands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".