← all works
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Field
- Decision Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- McMaster University
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Observational studyQuality (philosophy)Context (archaeology)Confidence intervalQuality of evidencePublication biasMedicineRandomized controlled trialEvidence-based medicineQuality ScoreAlternative medicineOperations managementInternal medicinePathologyEngineering
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no