Exposure of male rats to cyclophosphamide alters the chromatin structure and basic proteome in spermatozoa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The formation of mature sperm involves the expression of numerous proteins during spermiogenesis and the replacement of histones with protamines to package the genome. Exposure to cyclophosphamide (CPA), an anticancer alkylating agent, during spermiogenesis may disrupt chromatin condensation with adverse consequences to the offspring. METHODS: Adult male rats were given CPA in one of two schedules: (i) subchronic, 4 days - day 1 (100 mg kg(-1)) and days 2-4 (50 mg kg(-1) per day) or (ii) chronic - daily (6.0 mg kg(-1) per day). Animals were euthanized on days 14, 21 or 28. RESULTS: The effects of CPA on epididymal sperm chromatin structure were germ-cell-phase specific; mid-spermiogenic spermatids were most sensitive. The acridine orange DNA denaturation assay showed significant increases in susceptibility to denaturation (P < 0.01). Chromatin packaging assessment revealed 1,4-dithiothreitol-dependent chromomycin A3 DNA binding and less condensed, protamine-deficient sperm; the total thiol (P < 0.001) and protamine contents (P < 0.01), measured using monobromobimane and the HUP1N protamine 1 antibody, respectively, were reduced. The sperm basic proteome was also altered; proteins that were identified are involved in events during spermiogenesis and fertilization. CONCLUSIONS: Paternal exposure to CPA alters sperm chromatin structure, as well as the composition of sperm head basic proteins. We speculate that these changes underlie effects on fertilization and embryo development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".