MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2138099009

Exploring the Challenges of Conducting Respectful Research: Seen and Unforeseen Factors within Urban School Research.

2013· article· en· W2138099009 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julia Samaroo, Negin Dahya, Shahnaaz Alidina

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Discipline and Inequality
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipSociologyCritical reflectionAccountabilityStyle (visual arts)PedagogyHumanitiesLibrary sciencePolitical sciencePhilosophyLawArtComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

544x376 Normal 0 false false false EN-US JA X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:Table Normal; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Times New Roman;} This paper discusses the significance of conducting respectful research within urban schools, using the example of one large-scale university-school board partnership in north-western Toronto. The authors, three research assistants on the project, use their experiences within three of the participating project schools to interrogate the research approach and methods involved and highlight the challenges of conducting respectful research. The critical reflection the authors engage with builds on the existing conception of respectful research with the added inclusion of ‘accountability’ as a primary focus. The paper outlines how aspects of respectful research are both included and overlooked within this research project. Ce document traite de l'importance de mener des recherches respectueux dans les ecoles urbaines, en utilisant l'exemple d'un partenariat de grande envergure entre un universite et plusieurs ecoles dans le nord-ouest Toronto. Les auteurs, trois assistants de recherche sur le projet, l'utilisation de leurs experiences au sein detrois des ecoles participant au projet pour interroger la demarche de rechercheet les methodes et de souligner les defis de la recherche respectueuse. La reflexion critique, les auteurs s'engagent a fond sur la conception actuelle de la recherche respectueuse avec l'inclusion ajoutee de la ‘responsabilisation’ comme une priorite. Le document decrit comment certains aspects de la recherche sont a la fois respectueuses inclus et neglige dans ce projet de recherche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.490
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.536
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.629

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4900.536
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0470.125
Scholarly communication0.0540.036
Open science0.0060.032
Research integrity0.0090.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.690
GPT teacher head0.456
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducationSame topicEducation Discipline and InequalityFrench-language works237,207