MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S121 Lung Clearance Index to Evaluate the Effect of Ivacaftor on Lung Function in Subjects with CF Who Have the G551D-CFTR Mutation and Mild Lung Disease

2012· article· en· W2138388777 on OpenAlexaff
H. S. Sheridan, PSL Lee, Song Ts, AS Stone, FR Ratjen

Bibliographic record

VenueThorax · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
FundersMedical Research CouncilNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsIvacaftorMedicineExacerbationCrossover studyPlaceboPulmonary function testingInternal medicineWashoutLung functionLungCystic fibrosisGastroenterologyPathologyCystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Ivacaftor has been shown to lead to significant improvement in lung function, exacerbation rate, weight gain and quality of life in adolescents and adults with CF and the <i>G551D-CFTR</i> mutation. <h3>Objectives</h3> Drugs targeting the basic defect of CF may hold potential for patients with early stage disease, but establishing benefit is more difficult. If FEV<sub>1</sub> is normal, a more sensitive test may be useful. LCI has been shown to become abnormal at an earlier stage of disease than FEV<sub>1</sub> and thus may be a more sensitive outcome measure in this group of patients. <h3>Methods</h3> This Phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, crossover study evaluated the effect of ivacaftor on LCI derived from multibreath washout of SF<sub>6</sub> using an Innocor device. Subjects were ≥6 years with the <i>G551D-CFTR</i> mutation, FEV<sub>1</sub> &gt;90% predicted, and LCI &gt;7.4 (upper limit of normal). Ivacaftor 150 mg or placebo was administered twice daily for two 4-week periods with a 4-week washout in between. <h3>Results</h3> Twenty-one subjects were randomised and 20 received a dose of ivacaftor. Seventeen subjects completed both periods. Mean (SD) age was 16.6 (10.9) years. Mean (SD) baseline LCI was 9.0 (1.5). The treatment effect of ivacaftor for adjusted mean change from baseline in LCI at Day 29 was –2.1 (<i>P</i>=0.0004). Mean (SD) baseline FEV1 was 97.2% predicted (10.6%). Treatment difference for the mean change from baseline in FEV1 at Day 29 was 7.0 percentage points (<i>P</i>=0.0117). Treatment difference for the mean change from baseline in sweat chloride at Day 29 was –45.9 mmol/L (<i>P</i>&lt;0.0001). Treatment effect for the change from baseline in pooled CFQ-R Respiratory Domain score was 4.1 points versus placebo (<i>P</i>=0.4020). In the ivacaftor period, AEs and SAEs were reported in 13 and 2 subjects, respectively. In the placebo period, AEs and SAEs were reported in 15 and 1 subject, respectively. <h3>Conclusions</h3> In CF patients with mild lung disease, ivacaftor improved ventilation inhomogeneity as measured by LCI and respiratory function as measured by percent predicted FEV1. LCI is more sensitive to change in this mildly affected group of subjects and may be a useful outcome measure for future interventional trials in such patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.372

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThoraxSame topicCystic Fibrosis Research AdvancesFrench-language works237,207