Rheological characterisation of polysaccharides extracted from brown seaweeds
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hydrocolloids from seaweeds have interesting functional properties, such as thickening or gelling ability. Structural characteristics of polysaccharides extracted from Québec seaweeds have not yet been established. Thus, the determination of the relationship between their structure and rheological behaviour is limited. Alginate and fucoidan were extracted using selective solvents from three species: Saccharina longicruris, Ascophyllum nodosum and Fucus vesiculosus . Structural analysis (total sugars, uronic acids, sulfates and molecular weight) and rheological characterisation were performed at different polysaccharide concentrations with and without the addition of NaCl. The results showed important variation between species. Fucoidan and alginate exhibited Newtonian behaviour. Fucoidan extracted from F. vesiculosus had the highest viscosity level, which might be explained by the degree of branching of the molecules. For alginate, the one extracted from S. longicruris showed a higher apparent viscosity. This result can partially be explained by the block proportion of alginate. The gelation profile of alginate was also determined for each species. The final storage modulus, G ′, was variable for each species. Differences between species were observed for both polysaccharides as a result of structural variation. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it