Mitochondrial 3′ tRNA editing in the jakobid <i>Seculamonas ecuadoriensis</i>: A novel mechanism and implications for tRNA processing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The jakobid flagellates are bacteriovorus protists with mitochondrial genomes that are the most ancestral identified to date, in that they most resemble the genomes of the alpha-proteobacterial ancestors of the mitochondrion. Because of the bacterial character of jakobid mitochondrial genomes, it was expected that mechanisms for gene expression and RNA structures would be bacterial in nature. However, sequencing of the mitochondrial genome of the jakobid Seculamonas ecuadoriensis revealed several apparent mismatches in the acceptor stems of two predicted tRNAs. To investigate this observation, we determined the cDNA sequences of these tRNAs by RT-PCR. Our results show that the last three positions of the 3' extremity, plus the discriminator position of seryl and glutamyl tRNAs, are altered posttranscriptionally, restoring orthodox base-pairing and replacing the discriminator with an adenosine residue, in an editing process that resembles that of the metazoan Lithobius forficatus. However, the most 5' of the edited nucleotides is occasionally left unedited, indicating that the editing mechanism proceeds initially by exonucleolytic degradation, followed by repair of the degraded region. This 3' tRNA editing mechanism is likely distinct from that of L. forficatus, despite the apparent similarities between the two systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".