Induction of HIV-1 resistance: cell susceptibility to infection is an inverse function of globotriaosyl ceramide levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To examine the role of the glycosphingolipid (GSL), globotriaosylceramide (Gb(3), CD77, p(k) blood group antigen) in HIV-1 infection, we have pharmacologically modulated Gb(3) metabolism in an X4 HIV-1 infectable monocytic cell line (THP-1) that naturally expresses Gb(3) and in a Gb(3)-expressing glioblastoma cell line (U87) transfected to express both CD4 and CCR5 to permit R5 HIV-1 infection. THP-1 and U87 cells were treated with either a competitive inhibitor of alpha-galactosidase A, 1-deoxygalactonojirimycin (DGJ) to induce Gb(3) accumulation, or a glucosylceramide synthase inhibitor, phenyl-2-palmitylamino-3-pyrrolidino-1-propanol (P4) to deplete cells of Gb(3). HIV susceptibility was determined via measurement of p24(gag) antigen production by ELISA. In addition, total cellular Gb(3) content was determined using thin layer chromatography followed by Verotoxin1 overlay binding. The cell surface expression of Gb(3) was verified by FACS analysis. We found that DGJ significantly decreased THP-1 and U87 cell susceptibility to HIV-1(IIIB) and HIV-1(BaL) infection, respectively, at a concentration of approximately 100 microM. In contrast, P4 (2 microM) substantially increased cellular susceptibility to HIV-1 infection. Total cellular GSL analysis verified increased Gb(3) expression in cells treated with DGJ and considerable reduction of Gb(3) in P4-treated cells as compared to controls. These results show a reciprocal relationship between Gb(3) expression and infection with either X4 HIV-1(IIIB) or R5 HIV-1(Ba-L). These results support previous studies that Gb(3) provides resistance to HIV infection. Variable Gb(3) expression may provide a natural HIV resistance factor in the general population, and pharmacological manipulation of Gb(3) levels may provide an approach to induction of HIV resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".