Mitotic-cycle time and the development of embryo and endosperm in compatible and incompatible crosses in tuber-bearing<i>Solanum</i>species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To understand the relationship between early seed development and the EBN (endosperm balance number) hypothesis, the embryo and endosperm growth rates in crosses among Solanum spp. with the same and different EBNs were analyzed. For the embryo, the differences in the mean cell-doubling time (MCDT) between the compatible species 2x Solanum gourlayi and Solanum acaule was 3.9 h, whereas the incompatible species Solanum commersonii had MCDT differences of 10 and 13.9 h with 2x S. gourlayi and S. acaule, respectively. The embryo growth rates of the 2EBN species S. acaule and S. gourlayi were almost twice as fast as that of the 1EBN species S. commersonii. Nuclei of variable sizes were observed in the endosperms resulting from incompatible crosses. The author discusses the possibility that the collapse of the endosperm in inter-EBN crosses could be caused by differences in the MCDT between the parents that produce hybrid endosperms with high levels of DNA synthesis and transcription activity, resulting in increased nuclear size. A model is proposed to explain the formation of enlarged endosperm nuclei in incompatible crosses in the genus Solanum.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".