Identification of Genes Regulated by the <i>cepIR</i> Quorum-Sensing System in <i>Burkholderia cenocepacia</i> by High-Throughput Screening of a Random Promoter Library
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Burkholderia cenocepacia cepIR quorum-sensing system regulates expression of extracellular proteases, chitinase, and genes involved in ornibactin biosynthesis, biofilm formation, and motility. In a genome-wide screen we identified cepIR-regulated genes by screening a random promoter library of B. cenocepacia K56-2 constructed in a luminescence reporter detection plasmid for differential expression in response to N-octanoyl-l-homoserine lactone (OHL). Eighty-nine clones were identified; in 58 of these clones expression was positively regulated by cepIR, and in 31 expression was negatively regulated by cepIR. The expression profiles of the 89 promoter clones were compared in the cepI mutant K56-dI2 in medium supplemented with 30 pM OHL and K56-2 to confirm that the presence of OHL restored expression to wild-type levels. To validate the promoter library observations and to determine the effect of a cepR mutation on expression of selected genes, the mRNA levels of nine genes whose promoters were predicted to be regulated by cepR were quantitated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR in the wild type and cepI and cepR mutants. The expression levels of all nine genes were similar in the cepI and cepR mutants and consistent with the promoter-lux reporter activity. The expression of four selected cepIR-regulated gene promoters was examined in a cciIR mutant, and two of these promoters were also regulated by cciIR. This study extends our understanding of genes whose expression is influenced by cepIR and indicates the global regulatory effect of the cepIR system in B. cenocepacia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".