MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2143564454 · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4405

Whole-transcriptome analysis links trastuzumab sensitivity of breast tumors to both HER2 dependence and immune cell infiltration

2015· article· en· W2143564454 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Tiziana Triulzi, Loris De Cecco, Marco Sandri, Aleix Prat, Marta Giussani, Biagio Paolini, M.L. Carcangiu, Silvana Canevari, Alberto Bottini, Andrea Balsari, Sylvie Ménard, Daniele Generali, Manuela Campiglio, Serena Di Cosimo, Elda Tagliabue

Bibliographic record

VenueOncotarget · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBC Cancer AgencyFondazione PezcollerAssociazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul CancroCancer Research UK
KeywordsTrastuzumabMedicineBreast cancerOncologyInternal medicineMetastatic breast cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

// Tiziana Triulzi 1, * , Loris De Cecco 2, * , Marco Sandri 1 , Aleix Prat 3, 4 , Marta Giussani 1 , Biagio Paolini 5 , Marialuisa L. Carcangiu 5 , Silvana Canevari 2 , Alberto Bottini 6 , Andrea Balsari 1, 7 , Sylvie Menard 1 , Daniele Generali 6 , Manuela Campiglio 1 , Serena Di Cosimo 8 , Elda Tagliabue 1 1 Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Molecular Targeting Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy 2 Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Functional Genomics Core Facility, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy 3 Translational Genomics Group, Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain 4 Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain 5 Department of Pathology, Anatomic Pathology A Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy 6 Dipartimento di Terapia Molecolare e Farmacogenomica, Istituti Ospitalieri di Cremona, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy 8 Department of Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Tagliabue E, e-mail: elda.tagliabue@istitutotumori.mi.it Keywords: breast cancer, trastuzumab benefit, gene expression profiling, lymphocytes Received: April 22, 2015      Accepted: June 19, 2015      Published: July 01, 2015 ABSTRACT While results thus far demonstrate the clinical benefit of trastuzumab, some patients do not respond to this therapy. To identify a molecular predictor of trastuzumab benefit, we conducted whole-transcriptome analysis of primary HER2+ breast carcinomas obtained from patients treated with trastuzumab-containing therapies and correlated the molecular portrait with treatment benefit. The estimated association between gene expression and relapse-free survival allowed development of a trastuzumab risk model (TRAR), with ERBB2 and ESR1 expression as core elements, able to identify patients with high and low risk of relapse. Application of the TRAR model to 24 HER2+ core biopsies from patients treated with neo-adjuvant trastuzumab indicated that it is predictive of trastuzumab response. Examination of TRAR in available whole-transcriptome datasets indicated that this model stratifies patients according to response to trastuzumab-based neo-adjuvant treatment but not to chemotherapy alone. Pathway analysis revealed that TRAR-low tumors expressed genes of the immune response, with higher numbers of CD8-positive cells detected immunohistochemically compared to TRAR-high tumors. The TRAR model identifies tumors that benefit from trastuzumab-based treatment as those most enriched in CD8-positive immune infiltrating cells and with high ERBB2 and low ESR1 mRNA levels, indicating the requirement for both features in achieving trastuzumab response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.709

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOncotargetSame topicHER2/EGFR in Cancer ResearchFrench-language works237,207