Specialization of endoplasmic reticulum chaperones for the folding and function of myelin glycoproteins P0 and PMP22
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peripheral myelin protein 22 (PMP22) and protein 0 (P0) are major peripheral myelin glycoproteins, and mutations in these two proteins are associated with hereditary demyelinating peripheral neuropathies. Calnexin, calreticulin, and ERp57 are critical components of protein quality control responsible for proper folding of newly synthesized glycoproteins. Here, using confocal microscopy, we show that cell surface targeting of P0 and PMP22 is not affected in the absence of the endoplasmic reticulum chaperones. However, the folding and function (adhesiveness) of PMP22 and P0, measured using the adhesion assay, are affected significantly in the absence of calnexin but not in the absence of calreticulin. Deficiency in oxidoreductase ERp57 results in impaired folding and function of P0, a disulfide bond-containing protein, but does not have any effect on folding or function of PMP22 (a protein that does not contain a disulfide bond). We concluded that calnexin and ERp57, but not calreticulin, play an important role in the biology of peripheral myelin proteins PMP22 and P0, and, consequently, these chaperones may contribute to the pathogenesis of peripheral neuropathies and the diversity of these neurological disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it