Development of Lyophilized Gemini Surfactant-Based Gene Delivery Systems: Influence of Lyophilization on the Structure, Activity and Stability of the Lipoplexes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Cationic gemini surfactants have been studied as non-viral vectors for gene therapy. Clinical applications of cationic lipid/DNA lipoplexes are restricted by their instability in aqueous formulations. In this work, we investigated the influence of lyophilization on the essential physiochemical properties and in vitro transfection of gemini surfactant-lipoplexes. Additionally, we evaluated the feasibility of lyophilization as a technique for preparing lipoplexes with long term stability. METHODS: A gemini surfactant [12-7NH-12] and plasmid DNA encoding for interferon-γ were used to prepare gemini surfactant/pDNA [P/G] lipoplexes. Helper lipid DOPE [L] was incorporated in all formulation producing a [P/G/L] system. Sucrose and trehalose were utilized as stabilizing agents. To evaluate the ability of lyophilization to improve the stability of gemini surfactant-based lipoplexes, four lyophilized formulations were stored at 25˚C for three months. The formulations were analyzed at different time-points for physiochemical properties and in vitro transfection. RESULTS: The results showed that both sucrose and trehalose provided anticipated stabilizing effect. The transfection efficiency of the lipoplexes increased 2-3 fold compared to fresh formulations upon lyophilization. This effect can be attributed to the improvement of DNA compaction and changes in the lipoplex morphology due to the lyophilization/rehydration cycles. The physiochemical properties of the lyophilized formulations were maintained throughout the stability study. All lyophilized formulations showed a significant loss of gene transfection activity after three months of storage. Nevertheless, no significant losses of transfection efficiency were observed for three formulations after two months storage at 25 ˚C. CONCLUSION: Lyophilization significantly improved the physical stability of gemini surfactant-based lipoplexes compared to liquid formulations. As well, lyophilization improved the transfection efficiency of the lipoplexes. The loss of transfection activity upon storage is most probably due to the conformational changes in the supramolecular structure of the lipoplexes as a function of time and temperature rather than to DNA degradation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".