Construction and characterization of a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library of hexaploid wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>L.) and validation of genome coverage using locus-specific primers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A BAC library of hexaploid wheat was constructed using the spring wheat cultivar Triticum aestivum L. 'Glenlea'. Fresh shoot tissue from 7- to 10-day-old seedlings was used to obtain HMW DNA. The library was constructed using the HindIII site of pIndigoBAC-5 and the BamHI site of pIndigoBAC-5 and pECBAC1. A total of 12 ligations were used to construct the entire library, which contains over 650 000 clones. Ninety-six percent of the clones had inserts. The insert size ranged from 5 to 189 kb with an average of 79 kb. The entire library was gridded onto 24 high-density filters using a 5 x 5 array. A subset of these membranes was hybridized with two intergenic chloroplast probes and the percentage of clones containing chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) was calculated to be 2.2%. The genome coverage was estimated to be 3.1 x haploid genome equivalents, giving a 95.3% probability of identifying a clone corresponding to any wheat DNA sequence. BAC pools were constructed and screened using markers targeting the Glu-B1 locus (1BL), the hardness loci (5AS, 5BS, 5DS), the leaf rust resistance locus Lr1 (5DL), and the major fusarium head blight QTL locus located on 3BS. These markers were either locus-specific amplicons or microsatellites. A total of 49 BAC clones were identified for 14 markers giving an average of 3.5 clones/marker, thereby corroborating the estimated 3.1x genome coverage. An example using the gene encoding the HMW glutenin Bx7 is illustrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".