Community-Wide Outbreaks of Clonally Related CTX-M-14 β-Lactamase-Producing <i>Escherichia coli</i> Strains in the Calgary Health Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) typically cause nosocomial infections. Previous surveillance in the Calgary Health Region showed that Escherichia coli strains producing ESBLs were common among community patients. During the period (2000 to 2002): 23 of 157 (15%) of the strains were positive for blaCTX-M genes from the CTX-M-I group (CTX-M-1-like) and 87 of 157 (55%) of the strains were positive for blaCTX-M genes from the CTX-M-III group (CTX-M-14-like). The objective of this study was to investigate the molecular epidemiology of these strains. The beta-lactamases were characterized, and the genetic relatedness of the isolates was analyzed by digesting genomic DNA with the restriction endonuclease XbaI and by performing pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). PFGE revealed two closely related restriction patterns (clusters CTXM14A and CTXM14AR) among 67 (77%) CTX-M-14 producers. These strains from CTXM14A had nearly identical susceptibility patterns and were isolated most often from urine samples obtained at community sites during 2000 and 2001. Strains from the CTX-M-1-like and CTX-M-negative groups were unrelated to clusters CTXM14, CTXM14AR, and CTXM14NR. We conclude that clonally related strains of E. coli producing CTX-M-14 beta-lactamases were responsible for a predominantly community-wide outbreak. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether community-onset diseases caused by ESBL-producing E. coli are related to a point source or transmission within the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".