Improving the Immunogenicity of Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in HIV‐Infected Adults with a Toll‐Like Receptor 9 Agonist Adjuvant: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are often hyporesponsive to immunization, including pneumococcal vaccines. We hypothesized that adding CPG 7909, a toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist and vaccine adjuvant, to 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7vPnC) would increase its immunogenicity in HIV-infected adults. METHODS: We performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1b/2a trial randomizing HIV-positive patients to receive double doses of 7vPnC (Prevnar) at 0 and 3 months and 1 dose of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPV-23; Pneumo Novum) at 9 months, with experimental patients receiving 1 mg of CPG 7909 added to each of their 3 vaccine doses; control patients had phosphate-buffered saline added instead. Immunogenicity and safety were evaluated for up to 10 months. The primary end point was the proportion of vaccine high responders at 9 months, defined as a 2-fold increase in IgG levels to > or = 1 microg/mL for at least 5 of 7 of the 7vPnC serotypes. RESULTS: Ninety-seven participants were included in the study. The proportion of vaccine high responders was higher in the experimental group (n = 48) than among controls (n = 49; 48.8% vs 25.0%; P = .02) at 9 months. Greater proportions of high responders were also observed at 3 (51.1% vs 39.6%; P = .26), 4 (77.3% vs 56.3%; P = .03), and 10 months (87.8% vs 51.1%; P < .001). Mild systemic and injection site reactions to 7vPnC were more common in the experimental group than the control group (100% vs 81.3%; P = .002). CPG 7909 did not increase non-7vPnC IgG levels after PPV-23 immunization. No adverse effects on CD4(+) cell count or organ functions occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a TLR9 agonist to 7vPnC significantly enhanced the proportion of vaccine high responders. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00562939 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".