MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

IMPLICATION OF TOLL-LIKE RECEPTOR AND TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR α SIGNALING IN SEPTIC SHOCK

2005· review· en· W2149116091 on OpenAlexaff
Wen‐Jye Lin, Wen‐Chen Yeh

Bibliographic record

VenueShock · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmune Response and Inflammation
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeptic shockTumor necrosis factor alphaTLR4SepsisLipopolysaccharideImmunologyToll-like receptorSignal transductionCytokineMedicineInflammationImmune systemProinflammatory cytokineBiologyInnate immune systemCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Septic shock is initiated by a systemic inflammatory response to microbial infection that frequently leads to impaired perfusion and multiple organ failure. Because of its high risk of death, septic shock is a major problem particularly for patients in the intensive care unit. In general, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a strong activator of various immune responses and stimulates monocytes/macrophages to release a variety of inflammatory cytokines. However, overproduction of inflammatory factors in response to bacterial infections is known to cause septic shock, similar to that induced by LPS. Studies of LPS-signaling pathways and downstream inflammatory cytokines may have critical implications in the treatment of sepsis. In recent years, there has been significant progress in understanding the signaling pathways activated by LPS and its receptor Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), as well as by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), a potent inflammatory cytokine induced by LPS stimulation. This review briefly summarizes our current knowledge of these signaling pathways and critical signal transducers. Characterization of key signal transducers may allow us to identify tractable, novel targets for the therapeutic interventions of sepsis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations152
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueShockSame topicImmune Response and InflammationFrench-language works237,207