Successful<i>RPE65</i>Gene Replacement and Improved Visual Function in Humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA) is a group of severe autosomal recessive retinal dystrophies unified by the onset of blindness at birth and absence of ERG signals. Mutations in fourteen genes are currently associated with LCA, accounting for approximately 60% of patients. LCA genes encode retinal proteins that participate in a variety of significant retinal pathways ranging from photoreceptor development to replenishing vitamin A in the retinoid cycle. In some of the genetic subtypes of LCA (e.g. RPE65), viable photoreceptors and a relatively intact retina have been discovered. Consequently, successful photoreceptor and visual rescue have been achieved in mice and canine models of LCA. Two research groups, one in Philadelphia, USA (Maguire et al.) another in London, England (Bainbridge et al.) recently tested RPE65 replacement in two human trials with a total of six LCA patients. Remarkably, visual improvements were documented by ETDRS visual acuity measurements, pupillometry, nystagmus frequency, visual field measures, perimetry and an obstacle course. There were no local, or systemic side effects, nor improvements in ERG measures. These spectacular results will now stimulate further investigations of younger patients, higher dosages, and clinically or genetically related retinal disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".