Primary Occult Hepadnavirus Infection Induces Virus-Specific T-Cell and Aberrant Cytokine Responses in the Absence of Antiviral Antibody Reactivity in the Woodchuck Model of Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although the virological features of serologically silent hepadnaviral primary occult infection (POI) have been relatively well recognized in the woodchuck model of hepatitis B virus infection, the characteristics of accompanying immune responses remain unknown. In this study, the kinetics of woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV)-specific and generalized (mitogen-induced) T-cell proliferative responses and cytokine expression profiles in circulating lymphoid cells and the liver, along with WHV-specific antibody responses, were investigated during experimentally induced POI and subsequent challenge with a liver-pathogenic dose (>10(3) virions) or liver-nonpathogenic dose (50 virions) of the same virus. The data revealed that POI, which does not prompt WHV surface antigenemia, antiviral antibody response, and hepatitis or protect from challenge with a liver-pathogenic virus dose, was accompanied by the appearance of a strong WHV-specific T-cell response directed against multiple viral epitopes that intermittently persisted at low levels for up to 10-months during follow-up. Furthermore, immediately after exposure to a liver-nonpathogenic dose of WHV, lymphocytes acquired a heightened capacity to proliferate in response to mitogenic stimuli and displayed augmented expression of alpha interferon, interleukin-12 (IL-12), and IL-2, but not tumor necrosis factor alpha. Overall, the kinetics of WHV-specific and mitogen-induced T-cell proliferative and cytokine responses in POI were closely comparable to those seen in infection induced by liver-pathogenic viral doses. The data demonstrated that virus-specific T-cell proliferative reactivity is a very sensitive indicator of exposure to hepadnavirus, even to small amounts inducing serologically mute infection. They also showed that hepadnaviral POI is not only a molecularly but also an immunologically identifiable and distinctive entity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".