Group I intron-like insertions in SSU rDNA of <b><i>Cladonia gracilis</i></b> and <b><i>C. rangiferina</i></b>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During a study on population genetics of three species of Cladonia using the nuclear ribosomal 18S DNA, two species contained group I intron-like sequences located in positions 788 and 940 with reference to the E. coli 16S rDNA gene. The intron in position 940 was not typical of group I introns and had previously been described only from the Parmeliaceae and Lecanoraceae, but here we report the occurrence of this intron in the Cladoniaceae. The intron in position 788 had characteristics of group I introns and had previously been reported from the Physciaceae. In this paper we provide for the first time a putative RNA fold for the nS788 intron, compare the secondary RNA structure of the Cladonia group I introns (nS788 and nS940) to that of other taxa, and infer a phylogenetic history among 15 members of the Lecanorales based on the evolutionary history of the nS788 group I intron. The RNA fold for nS788 contained two optional hairpins, P2.1 and a potentially newly described hairpin referred to as P5.1. The phylogenetic hypothesis supports the monophyly of the genus Cladonia. It also supports the separation of two large groups in the Physciaceae; the Buellia-group and the Physcia-group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".