Molecular Characterization of Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia Reveals Frequent Occurrence of Two B-Cell Clones Having Distinct IgH VDJ Sequences
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Malignant B lineage cells in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM) express a unique clonotypic IgM VDJ. The occurrence of biclonal B cells and their clonal relationships were characterized. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Bone marrow and blood from 20 WM patients were analyzed for clonotypic VDJ sequences, clonal B-cell frequencies, and the complementary determining region 3 profile. RESULTS: Two different clonotypic VDJ sequences were identified in 4 of 20 WM. In two cases, partner clones had different VDJ rearrangements, with one clonotypic signature in bone marrow and a second in blood. For both cases, the bone marrow clone was hypermutated, whereas the blood clone was germ line or minimally mutated. In two other cases, partner clones shared a common VDJ rearrangement but had different patterns of somatic mutations. They lacked intraclonal diversity and were more abundant in bone marrow than in blood. VDJ mutation profiles suggested they arose from a common IgM progenitor. Single-cell analysis in one case indicated the partner clones were reciprocally expressed, following rules of allelic exclusion. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of two B-cell clones having distinct VDJ sequences is common in WM, suggesting that frequent transformation events may occur. In two cases, the partner clones had distinct tissue distributions in either blood or bone marrow, were of different immunoglobulin isotypes, and in one case exhibited differential response to therapy. The contributions of each clone are unknown. Their presence suggests that WM may involve a background of molecular and cellular events leading to emergence of one or more malignant clones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".