MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2152573097 · doi:10.1096/fj.06-7691com

Biphenyl 2,3′,4,5′,6‐pentakisphosphate, a novel inositol polyphosphate surrogate, modulates Ca <sup>2+</sup> responses in rat hepatocytes

2007· article· en· W2152573097 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Fabrice Vandeput, Laurent Combettes, Stephen Mills, Katrien Backers, Alexandre Wohlkönig, Jan B. Parys, Humbert De Smedt, Ludwig Missiaen, Geneviève Dupont, Barry V. L. Potter, Christophé Erneux

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungFiducie de Recherche sur la Foret des Cantons-de-l'EstWellcome Trust
KeywordsPolyphosphateChemistryInositolPhosphataseStereochemistryBiphenylSubstrate (aquarium)Inositol phosphatePhosphateBiochemistryEnzymeReceptorBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Benzene polyphosphates containing phosphate groups on one ring are Ins(1,4,5)P 3 5‐phosphatase inhibitors when evaluated against type‐I Ins(1,4,5)P 3 5‐phosphatase. A novel biphenyl derivative, biphenyl 2,3′,4,5′,6‐pentakisphosphate, with five phosphate groups on two rings was synthesized: It inhibited the activity of two inositol 5‐phosphatases: type I and SHIP2 with Ins(1,3,4,5)P 4 as substrate. The inhibition was competitive with respect to the substrate. IC 50 value measured in rat hepatocytes, which contains the native Ins(1,4,5)P 3 5‐phosphatase, was in the micromolar range at 1.0 μM Ins(1,4,5)P 3 as substrate. Biphenyl 2,3′,4,5′,6‐pentakisphosphate did not affect the activity of Ins(1,4,5)P 3 3‐kinase A in the 5‐100 μM range. Surprisingly, experimental evidence supports an effect of biphenyl 2,3′,4,5′,6‐pentakisphosphate at the level of the Ins(1,4,5)P 3 receptor. Finally, when injected into rat hepatocytes, the analog affected the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations in a positive or negative way depending on its concentration. At very high concentrations of the analog, Ca 2+ oscillations were even suppressed. These data were interpreted as a dual effect of the biphenyl 2,3′,4,5′,6‐pentakisphosphate on cytosolic [Ca 2+ ] increases: an activation effect through an increase in Ins(1,4,5)P 3 level via Ins(1,4,5)P 3 5‐phosphatase inhibition and an inhibitory effect, which was exerted directly on the Ins(1,4,5)P 3 receptor. Thus, our data show for the first time that the frequency of Ca 2+ oscillations in response to a Ca 2+ ‐mobilizing agonist can be controlled by inhibitors of type‐I Ins(1,4,5)P 3 5‐phosphatase.—Vandeput, F., Combettes, L., Mills, S. J., Backers, K., Wohlkönig, A., Parys, J. B., De Smedt, H., Missiaen, L., Dupont, G., Potter, B. V. L., Erneux, C. Biphenyl 2,3′,4,5′,6‐pentakisphosphate, a novel inositol polyphosphate surrogate, modulates Ca2+ responses in rat hepatocytes. FASEB J. 21, 1481–1491 (2007)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.892

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase SignalingFrench-language works237,207